Vendor profile
Map public company identity, ownership, locations, product scope, operating history, and the pages supporting each material fact.
AI VENDOR DUE DILIGENCE
Review a prospective vendor across current public web sources. Build one cited brief for the procurement decision in front of your company now.
For direct companies and users · One review per request · No background monitoring
DECISION SIGNAL
The public product fit is clear. Data-retention and subprocessors still need direct documentary evidence.Research finding · not a compliance conclusionWHAT YOU GET
Map public company identity, ownership, locations, product scope, operating history, and the pages supporting each material fact.
Compare published product, security, privacy, support, and compliance statements with the evidence available on the public web.
Separate confirmed public claims from inference and identify the documents or direct answers the vendor still needs to provide.
Turn the findings into fit signals, risks, open questions, and a human-owned next step for the procurement process.
REQUIREMENTS → EVIDENCE → REVIEW
State the purchase, renewal, shortlist, or partnership decision and the requirements that matter to your company.
Provide the exact company, product, geography, use case, time horizon, known URLs, and any namesakes to exclude.
Search mode researches the web for that request when the selected supported model has web search available.
Open cited links, verify dates and entities, and take unresolved security, legal, financial, or compliance claims to qualified reviewers and the vendor.
STARTER REQUEST
Review [vendor and product] for [company use case] in [geography]. Use current public web sources. Check company identity, product fit, public pricing, security and privacy claims, support terms, incidents, and evidence gaps. Separate sourced facts from inference, cite material claims, and finish with the questions and documents we need before approval.
HONEST PRODUCT BOUNDARY
Search helps organize public evidence. Qualified people still own security, legal, finance, privacy, and procurement decisions.
✓ Web search for the current request on supported models
✓ Cited links returned with the answer stay visible
✓ Saved authenticated conversation for follow-up analysis
✓ Public claims and gaps organized into a review brief
× Security testing, audit, certification, or legal advice
× Private data rooms, portals, reports, or questionnaires
× Vendor outreach, references, or system access
× Recurring scans, alerts, or automatic refreshes
VERIFIED PLAN FACTS
Try the Search workflow with the starter workspace and available Free models.
Higher capacity, advanced models, and Compare for repeated request-by-request reviews.
BEFORE YOU REVIEW
Search mode uses web search when it is available for the selected supported model. It answers the current request and keeps the exact cited links returned with that response visible for review.
No. This is a request-by-request review. TraceRemove does not schedule recurring searches, watch vendor pages after the conversation ends, send change alerts, or refresh a due-diligence brief automatically.
No. Search can organize public statements about certifications, policies, incidents, status history, and controls, but it cannot test systems, inspect internal controls, validate private audit reports, or issue a security, legal, privacy, or compliance conclusion.
No. This page promises public web research only. It does not sign into vendor portals, access private documents, request references, send questionnaires, or contact companies on your behalf.
No. Public sources can be outdated, selective, duplicated, or wrong, and models can misidentify entities or misread claims. Verify material facts and obtain direct evidence before approving a vendor.
TraceRemove is sold to companies and people using the workspace directly. There is no reseller, partner, agency, or white-label route.
START WITH THE DECISION